Alonso-Campos

Alonso-Campos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202624-7477California579 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ALEXANDER ALONSO- No. 24-7477 CAMPOS; MARIA DILCIA Agency Nos.

SERRANO; B.G.A.-S.; Y.A.A.-S., A240-304-464

A240-304-463

Petitioners,

A240-304-465

A240-304-466

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Alexander Alonso-Campos, Maria Dilcia Serrano, and their two sons,

B.G.A.-S. and Y.A.A.-S., are natives and citizens of Honduras. They petition for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). untimely motion to reopen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.