George

Filed 3/17/26 George v. Hartman CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

KOSHY PUTHUKKERIL GEORGE, H052049, H052217, H052218 (Santa Clara County Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 21CH010234)

v.

ERIC FLOYD HARTMAN,

Appellant.

In these three appeals, Eric Floyd Hartman appeals from the trial court’s order on respondent Koshy Puthukkeril George’s motion for recovery of attorney fees and costs.1 Mr. George requested the fees for prevailing on a request to modify a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) and a request to renew the CHRO in the trial court, in addition to an appeal regarding the granting of the CHRO. Mr. Hartman contends the court lacked jurisdiction to rule on fees in connection with the appeal because the…