Mussi

Mussi v. Fontes

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202625-1427California899 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCOT MUSSI; STEVEN GAYNOR, No. 25-1427 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 2:24-cv-01310-DWL v.

MEMORANDUM*

ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 2, 2026 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs Scot Mussi and Steven Gaynor are registered voters in the State of

Arizona. Plaintiffs bring claims against the Arizona Secretary of State under the

National Voter Registration Act, 52 U.S.C. § 20510(b). They allege that the

Secretary of State has failed to conduct the voter roll maintenance required by that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. statute, id. § 20507, and they seek injunctive relief compelling him to “develop and

implement additional .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.