Bondi

Lopez Palacios v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202625-455California1,120 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIGLER LOPEZ-PALACIOS; DORIS No. 25-455 MERIDA-MERIDA; M. L. M.; E. L. M., Agency Nos.

A220-939-600

Petitioners, A220-939-601

A220-939-602

v.

A220-939-603

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Vigler Lopez-Palacios (“Lopez”), his wife Doris Merida-Merida (“Merida”),

and their two minor children, M.L.M. and G.L.M., citizens and nationals of

Guatemala, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.