Bondi
Lopez Palacios v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VIGLER LOPEZ-PALACIOS; DORIS No. 25-455 MERIDA-MERIDA; M. L. M.; E. L. M., Agency Nos.
A220-939-600
Petitioners, A220-939-601
A220-939-602
v.
A220-939-603
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 13, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: CALLAHAN, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Vigler Lopez-Palacios (“Lopez”), his wife Doris Merida-Merida (“Merida”),
and their two minor children, M.L.M. and G.L.M., citizens and nationals of
Guatemala, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)…