Bondi

Alvarez Mendoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202625-2362California755 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DELGADINA ALVAREZ MENDOZA; A. No. 25-2362 B. A.; J. B. A., Agency Nos.

A216-548-461

Petitioners, A216-548-463

A216-548-464

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Delgadina Alvarez Mendoza and her minor children, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing their appeal of a decision from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (collectively, the “Agency”) denying Alvarez Mendoza’s application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.