Steven Walker, I v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202623-55525California376 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN ERIC WALKER, No. 23-55525

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00031-DMS-AGS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE

OF CALIFORNIA; DOES, 1 through 100,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Steven Eric Walker appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his constitutional challenge to firearms restrictions for persons convicted of a

felony. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.