Steven Walker, I v. USA
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202623-55525California376 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN ERIC WALKER, No. 23-55525
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00031-DMS-AGS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE
OF CALIFORNIA; DOES, 1 through 100,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Steven Eric Walker appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing
his constitutional challenge to firearms restrictions for persons convicted of a
felony. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…