City of Alameda v. Sheehan CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2026A170059California5,466 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 3/17/26 City of Alameda v. Sheehan CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CITY OF ALAMEDA,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A170059

v. SHELBY SHEEHAN, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant. 23CV037442)

After a four-day trial, the jury returned a verdict in this unlawful detainer case against defendant Shelby Sheehan and in favor of plaintiff City of Alameda. Sheehan appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). In her motion, Sheehan advanced a number of arguments. They can generally be characterized as (1) the City failed to carry its burden to prove the residential property it rented to Sheehan was habitable, (2) the jury was not adequately schooled on the law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.