Maciel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IGNACIO MACIEL, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03718-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S

v. FEES, EXPENSES, AND SERVICE

AWARDS

M.A.C. COSMETICS INC., Re: Dkt. No. 81 Defendant.

12 On January 15, 2026, this Court held a Final Approval Hearing to determine whether the terms and conditions of the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release (“Settlement”) agreed to by named Plaintiffs Ignacio Maciel and Ruth Torres and Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. (“MAC”) should be approved by the Court. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court also considered Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs, class representative enhancements, and settlement administrator’s expenses. See Dkt. No. 81. Having read the unopposed papers filed by Plaintiffs and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the requests in part for the following reasons. I. …