Yajaira Padilla-Perdomo v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202617-70299California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YAJAIRA PADILLA-PERDOMO; A. A., No. 17-70299

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-715-258

A206-715-259

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Yajaira Padilla-Perdomo and her minor daughter, A. A.,1 natives and

citizens of Honduras, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 A. A. is a derivative beneficiary of Padilla-Perdomo’s asylum application. denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.