Valera

Valera v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-5974California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL VALERA, No. 24-5974 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00191-DAD-EFB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

B. VASQUEZ, CO at CSP-Sacramento,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Joel Valera appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his Eighth

Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Desire, LLC v. Manna Textiles, Inc., 986 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2021).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.