Westreich

United States v. Westreich

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-7184California540 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7184 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cv-09013-SSS-SK v.

MEMORANDUM*

MEIR JOSEPH WESTREICH, Attorney,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Meir Jospeh Westreich appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in the government’s action to reduce to judgment Westreich’s income tax

assessments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Bussey v. Driscoll, 131 F.4th 756, 761 (9th Cir. 2025). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.