Stanford

Stanford v. Lombardo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-6644California304 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRUDY STANFORD, No. 24-6644 D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00642-CSD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JOSEPH MICHAEL LOMBARDO; JACK

ROBB; ROB BOEHMER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Craig S. Denney, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted March 16, 2026***

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Trudy Stanford appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from a dispute over funds

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from a deferred compensation account. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.