McGee

McGee v. Santa Clara County Office of the District Attorney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-5356California278 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY McGEE, No. 24-5356 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-02608-CRB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY; LINDSEY

WALSH; MILPITAS POLICE

DEPARTMENT; SANTA CLARA

COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; PALO

ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Anthony McGee appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth and Fourteenth

Amendment violations arising from his arrest,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.