McGee
McGee v. Santa Clara County Office of the District Attorney
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-5356California278 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY McGEE, No. 24-5356 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-02608-CRB Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY; LINDSEY
WALSH; MILPITAS POLICE
DEPARTMENT; SANTA CLARA
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; PALO
ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Anthony McGee appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth and Fourteenth