Hugo Rodriguez-Carrera v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202618-71960California2,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

HUGO CESAR RODRIGUEZ-CARRERA, No. 18-71960 AKA Juan Perez, Agency No. A200-976-163 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BADE.

Hugo Rodriguez-Carrera (“Rodriguez”) petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen to seek cancellation

of removal, asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention of

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.