Hugo Rodriguez-Carrera v. Pamela Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
HUGO CESAR RODRIGUEZ-CARRERA, No. 18-71960 AKA Juan Perez, Agency No. A200-976-163 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BADE.
Hugo Rodriguez-Carrera (“Rodriguez”) petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen to seek cancellation
of removal, asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention of
Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. §…