Freeze

Freeze v. Gallagher

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-5620California448 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC STEPHEN FREEZE, No. 24-5620 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01135-JLR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ELIZABETH E. GALLAGHER; JOSE T.

ACUNA; ANN G. FREEZE, Revocable Trust; RONALD L. FREEZE, Revocable Trust; JAMES MASSINGALE; ANGELA

MASSINGALE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Eric Stephen Freeze appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment on the

pleadings in his action alleging federal claims related to family property. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.