Estavillo

Estavillo v. Cortese

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-6910California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIK ESTAVILLO, No. 24-6910 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-04032-VKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

DAVE CORTESE; COUNTRY CLUB

VILLA APARTMENTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Virginia Kay DeMarchi, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted March 16, 2026***

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Erik Estavillo appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.