Collins

Collins v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-5784California464 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN RAY COLLINS; SHARON No. 24-5784 LAVETTE COLLINS, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02676-DAD-CSK Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS

FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ Circuit Judges.

Steven Ray Collins and Sharon Lavette Collins appeal pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging claims under the Fair

Housing Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.