Brooks

Brooks v. Lee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-4653California361 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODNEY BROOKS, No. 24-4653 D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00374-WBS-JDP Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

S. LEE, Correctional Lieutenant; S.

BEASLEY; J. LEE; E. ARNOLD, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rodney Brooks appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First and

Fourteenth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse of discretion denials…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.