Brooks
Brooks v. Lee
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RODNEY BROOKS, No. 24-4653 D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00374-WBS-JDP Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
S. LEE, Correctional Lieutenant; S.
BEASLEY; J. LEE; E. ARNOLD, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Rodney Brooks appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First and
Fourteenth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse of discretion denials…