Sindlev

Weird Science, LLC v. Sindlev

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202624-7251California779 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WEIRD SCIENCE, LLC; WILLIAM No. 24-7251 ANDERSON WITTEKIND, derivatively on D.C. No. behalf of Renovaro Biosciences, Inc., 2:24-cv-00645-HDV-MRW Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

RENE SINDLEV; MARK DYBUL;

GREGG ALTON; JAMES SAPIRSTEIN;

JAYNE MCNICOL; HENRIK

GRONFELDT SORENSEN; PASECO

APS; OLE ABILDGAARD; KARSTEN

REE HOLDING I APS; KARSTEN REE

HOLDING B APS; KARSTEN REE; PO-

MA INVEST APS; TBC INVEST AS;

TORBEN BJORN CHRISTENSEN; K&L

GATES, LLP; CLAYTON E. PARKER;

LINCOLN PARK CAPITAL FUND, LLC;

RS GROUP APS; RS BIO APS;

RENOVARO, INC.; CAROL L.

BROSGART; AVRAM MILLER; KAREN

BRINK; YALLA YALLA, LTD.; DOES, 1-

10; CARL L. BROSGART,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Hernan Diego Vera, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.