Morales-Hernandez

United States v. Morales-Hernandez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202625-5581California205 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-5581 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:23-cr-00555-RCC-BGM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUIS ANTONIO MORALES-

HERNANDEZ, AKA Luis Morales, AKA Luis Morales-Hernandez,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Luis Antonio Morales-Hernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges the supervised release conditions imposed on remand for

resentencing.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Morales-Hernandez’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.