Kim

United States v. Kim

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202625-5216California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-5216 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:25-cr-00041-LK-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

FILMORE DOYOON KIM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Lauren J. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Filmore Doyoon Kim appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for making a false

statement in connection with the acquisition of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(a)(6).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kim’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

stating that there are no non-frivolous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.