Moposita-Laminia

Moposita-Laminia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202625-2847California574 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILSON RODRIGO MOPOSITA- No. 25-2847 LAMINIA; et al., Agency Nos.

A220-568-773

Petitioners, A220-568-774

A220-568-775

v.

A220-568-776

A220-568-777

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent. MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Wilson Rodrigo Moposita-Laminia and his family, natives and citizens of

Ecuador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying

their applications for asylum, and Moposita-Laminia’s applications for withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.