People v. Rajagopal CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2026F089095California1,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/26 P. v. Rajagopal CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F089095

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR-22-011456) v.

GOPI RAJAGOPAL, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Saul Garcia, Judge. Matthew A. Lopas, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Hill, P. J., Peña, J. and Harrell, J. A jury convicted defendant Gopi Rajagopal of criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422, subd. (a)).1 Defendant’s appellate counsel makes no claim of error and requests our independent review of the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.