Stewart Onan, et al. v. Databricks, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20263:24-cv-01451California2,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEWART ONAN, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01451-CRB (LJC)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE AT ECF NO. 248

DATABRICKS, INC., et al., Re: ECF Nos. 246, 248 Defendants.

12 The parties disagree over (1) whether Defendants must answer Plaintiffs’ Interrogatory Nos. 42-50, (2) whether Defendants must produce licensing agreements for text data and related communications, and (3) whether Patrick Wendell may be designated as a document custodian. ECF Nos. 247-3, 248. The close of fact discovery, originally set for November 21, 2025, was continued to January 5, 2026. ECF No. 238. Having considered the record in this case, the parties’ arguments, and the relevant legal authority, the undersigned rules as follows: Defendants shall answer Plaintiffs’ Interrogatory Nos. 42-50. Defendants shall produce licensing agreements for text data (but do not need to produce related communications). Defendants are not required to conduct a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.