Thompson

David A. Thompson v. James S. Hill, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20263:24-cv-00357California3,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID A. THOMPSON, Case No.: 24-cv-357-TWR-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTIONS [Dkt. Nos. 22, 42, 43, 59, 61] JAMES S. HILL, et al., and Defendants. REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDER

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

AS MOOT [Dkt. No. 48]

19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court are several motions by Plaintiff: Motion for Early Discovery to Identify Doe Defendant, Motion for Good Cause Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), Motion to Locate Defendant Under Seal, Motion to Request Update on Named Defendants, and Motion to Substitute Party and Request U.S. Marshal Service. Dkt. Nos. 22, 42, 43, 59, 61. The Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion for Good Cause (Dkt. No. 42) as a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. Additionally,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.