Wofford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAIL WOFFORD, Case No. 24-cv-07509-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES MOTION FOR SUMMARY

LLC, JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING

MOTIONS TO SEAL

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 35,

Gail Wofford, who is proceeding without the benefit of counsel, initiated this lawsuit after receiving hundreds of calls from debt collector Portfolio Recovery Associates (PRA). Her operative complaint alleges that these calls violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Specifically, Wofford alleges that the calls were made either using an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) or an artificial or prerecorded voice. The parties have now filed cross motions for summary judgment. Though Wofford’s annoyance is understandable, she has not shown a genuine dispute of material fact regarding elements of her TCPA claims. As further set forth below, PRA’s motion for summary judgment is therefore GRANTED and Wofford’s motion for summary judgment is…