Brown

Brown v. Miller

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-2521California419 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALICE HELEN BROWN, No. 24-2521 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:18-cv-07826-VC v.

MEMORANDUM*

Police Officer ETHAN MILLER,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

DEL NORTE, CITY OF CRESCENT

CITY, Crescent City Manager ERIC

WIER, CRESCENT CITY POLICE

DEPARTMENT, Chief of Police IVAN

MINSAL, GOVERNOR OF

CALIFORNIA,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 19, 2026**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Alice Helen Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

following a jury trial on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.