Bondi
Rocha Rodriguez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202625-317California1,015 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARINA ROCHA RODRIGUEZ; DULCE No. 25-317 MARIA ROSAS ROCHA, Agency Nos.
A209-385-904
Petitioners, A209-385-905 v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted March 6, 2026 Seattle, Washington
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Marina Rocha Rodriguez and her daughter, Dulce Maria Rosas Rocha
(“Rocha Rodriguez” or “Petitioners”), petition for review of the decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying their applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture
(“CAT”).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We review the BIA’s order, as well as the portions of the IJ decision that the