Bondi

Rocha Rodriguez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202625-317California1,015 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARINA ROCHA RODRIGUEZ; DULCE No. 25-317 MARIA ROSAS ROCHA, Agency Nos.

A209-385-904

Petitioners, A209-385-905 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 6, 2026 Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Marina Rocha Rodriguez and her daughter, Dulce Maria Rosas Rocha

(“Rocha Rodriguez” or “Petitioners”), petition for review of the decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying their applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We review the BIA’s order, as well as the portions of the IJ decision that the

BIA incorporated as its own.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.