Dam

Dam v. Waldron

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202625-2459California1,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUN DAM, No. 25-2459 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:24-cv-00417-SAB v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARK D. WALDRON, Chapter 7 Trustee; Ms. PAMELA MARIE EGAN Esquire, Bankruptcy Counsel; POTOMAC LAW

GROUP, PLLC; GIGA WATT

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley Allen Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 19, 2026**

Before: CLIFTON, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jun Dam appeals the district court’s order dismissing

with prejudice his claims against Defendants-Appellees. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

“We review de novo a dismissal for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.