Rajapakse

Rajapakse v. Trueblue

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-3956California639 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMANTHA RAJAPAKSE, No. 24-3956 D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05785-KKE Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

TRUEBLUE; PEOPLESCOUT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Kymberly K. Evanson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Samantha Rajapakse appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her employment action alleging violations of Title VII, the Americans

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“ADEA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Hawn v. Exec. Jet…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.