Eiland

Eiland v. Sigmon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-3539California318 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY CARL EILAND, No. 24-3539 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00926-MTL-- Plaintiff - Appellant, ESW v.

MEMORANDUM*

DWAYNE SIGMON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Randy Carl Eiland, who is housed in a private prison in

Arizona, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging substantive due process violations arising from his refusal to

report to the medical department. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo a dismissal under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.