W.R.

W.R. v. G.B. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2026C103758California795 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feinberg, J.

BACKGROUND

At the outset, we note that the record before us consists of only a short clerk’s transcript as well as several minute orders and motions with which the record was augmented at G.B.’s request. It does not include a reporter’s transcript of the relevant oral proceedings or a suitable substitute. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.120(b).) The

1 sparse record before us indicates that, on May 3, 2024, a proof of personal service was filed with the trial court indicating that G.B. had been served with a copy of a temporary restraining order and a notice of a court hearing. On May 13, 2024, according to a minute order, the court held a hearing on a request for a restraining order. G.B. was not present. The court granted respondent W.R.’s request for a civil harassment restraining order and set the restraining order to expire on May 13, 2025. On January 17, 2025, G.B. filed a “motion to convict plaintiff of com[m]itting perjury in court and to dismiss TRO after the fact,” in which he argued, among other things, that the proof of service filed with the trial court was fraudulent. (Capitalization omitted.) On March 24, 2025, the trial court held a hearing on G.B.’s request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.