People v. Pirozzi CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2026B343599California3,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 3/19/26 P. v. Pirozzi CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B343599 (Super. Ct. No. 21CR04504) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

ADAM MICHAEL PIROZZI,

Defendant and Appellant.

Adam Michael Pirozzi appeals a restitution order following no contest pleas to two counts of embezzlement (Pen. Code1, § 506; counts 1 & 4). He also admitted an aggravated white- collar crime enhancement because he caused a loss in excess of $500,000. (§ 186.11, subd. (a)(1).) Pirozzi was placed on probation with conditions. After a restitution hearing the trial court ordered him to pay restitution.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. Pirozzi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.