Petit Jackson v. Der Nederlanden

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-6631California319 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOCIENNE ELIZABETH PETIT No. 24-6631 JACKSON, D.C. No. 2:24-cv-05291-SPG-PD Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN,

Lawyer; PELS RIJCKEN, Lawyer; STAAT

DER BELGIUM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Mocienne Elizabeth Petit Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction her action against the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Netherlands, Belgium, and a law firm. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.