Forrester
Forrester v. Reshad
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-7730California453 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTINE FORRESTER, No. 24-7730 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00373-MWF- Plaintiff - Appellant, MAR v.
MEMORANDUM*
MOHAMAD A. RESHAD, D.D.S.;
ARTLAB DENTISTRY, Dental Office of Dr. Reshad, a California Corporation; TED
CONLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Christine Forrester appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her civil action alleging federal and state law claims arising from her
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dental treatment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo
a dismissal for…