Forrester

Forrester v. Reshad

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-7730California453 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTINE FORRESTER, No. 24-7730 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00373-MWF- Plaintiff - Appellant, MAR v.

MEMORANDUM*

MOHAMAD A. RESHAD, D.D.S.;

ARTLAB DENTISTRY, Dental Office of Dr. Reshad, a California Corporation; TED

CONLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Christine Forrester appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her civil action alleging federal and state law claims arising from her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dental treatment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

a dismissal for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.