Eiland

Eiland v. Mendez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202625-3920California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY CARL EILAND, No. 25-3920 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00781-MTL-- Plaintiff - Appellant, ESW v.

MEMORANDUM*

TAD MENDEZ, Discipline Hearing Officer at Saguaro Correctional Center; A. MORROW, Discipline Hearing Officer at Saguaro Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Randy Carl Eiland, who is housed in a private prison in

Arizona, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1983 action alleging due process violations arising from two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.