In re Menchaca CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2026G064371California4,669 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/19/26 In re Menchaca CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re STEPHEN MENCHACA, G064371

on Habeas Corpus. (Super. Ct. No. 93SF0230)

OPINION

Original proceedings; petition for writ of habeas corpus after a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Jonathan S. Fish, Judge. Petition denied. Stephen Menchaca, in pro. per.; and James R. Bostick, Jr., under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Sara J. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, Amanda J. Murray and Rachael A. Campbell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. In 1994, a jury found Stephen Menchaca guilty of the attempted premeditated and deliberate murder of his spouse and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.