Estate of Dakota Michael Anderson-Turner v. County of Lake, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20263:25-cv-05431California5,445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ESTATE OF DAKOTA MICHAEL Case No. 25-cv-05431-SI

ANDERSON-TURNER,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART COUNTY v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FAC, AND SCHEDULING FURTHER COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 41 12 13 Now before the Court is the motion by County defendants to dismiss the first amended complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rue 7-1(b), the Court found this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART the motion to dismiss, and schedules a Further Case Management Conference for May 7, 2026. 19 BACKGROUND I. Factual Background For the purposes of deciding the motion to dismiss, the Court treats as true the allegations in the first amended complaint. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.