Carasco
United States v. Carasco
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2010 D.C. No. Appellee, 8:19-cr-00169-JVS-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
JESUS ERIC CARASCO,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Jesus Eric Carasco appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Carasco contends that, after trial, the government disclosed a video
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). recording that would have discredited testimony by law enforcement that Carasco
confessed after…