Carasco

United States v. Carasco

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202625-2010California295 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2010 D.C. No. Appellee, 8:19-cr-00169-JVS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JESUS ERIC CARASCO,

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Eric Carasco appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Carasco contends that, after trial, the government disclosed a video

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). recording that would have discredited testimony by law enforcement that Carasco

confessed after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.