Saidwal

Saidwal v. Flagship

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202624-6573California439 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIBI NOHIA SAIDWAL, No. 24-6573 D.C. No. 4:19-cv-08211-JSW Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

FLAGSHIP,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Bibi Nohia Saidwal appeals pro se from the district court’s order confirming

an arbitration award in favor of defendant under the Federal Arbitration Act. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Johnson v. Gruma

Corp., 614 F.3d 1062, 1065 (9th Cir. 2010) (confirmation of arbitration award);

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Collins v. D.R. Horton,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.