Bondi

Perez De Lopez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202625-851California997 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA MADGALENA PEREZ DE No. 25-851 LOPEZ; JOSE NOEL LOPEZ PEREZ, Agency Nos.

A209-900-168

Petitioners, A209-900-169 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Maria Magdalena Perez De Lopez (“Perez De Lopez” or “Petitioner”) and

her son Jose Noel Lopez Perez (“Lopez Perez”), natives and citizens of El

Salvador (collectively, “Petitioners”), petition for review of the decision of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal of the Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.