Calderon

Calderon v. Vue

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202624-5976California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CRISTOBAL CALDERON, No. 24-5976 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00124-DAD-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

C. VUE; R. FREITAS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Juan Cristobal Calderon appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and remand.

The district court granted summary judgment in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.