Calderon
Calderon v. Vue
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202624-5976California350 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN CRISTOBAL CALDERON, No. 24-5976 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00124-DAD-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
C. VUE; R. FREITAS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Juan Cristobal Calderon appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth
Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and remand.