People v. Rood CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2026C103478California480 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

BACKGROUND

In January 2025, Rood was served with, but refused to sign, his conditions of parole, which required him to participate in a sex offender treatment program, sign all necessary documents to do so, and prohibited him from possessing a knife with a blade over two inches. In February 2025, Rood refused to sign the paperwork required to enter a sex offender treatment program. Thereafter, Rood was arrested for violating parole and a search of his vehicle located a tote bag containing a knife with a blade of approximately five inches. A petition for revocation of parole filed in March 2025 alleged Rood violated parole by failing to participate in a sex offender treatment program and possessing a knife with a blade over two inches. In April 2025, the trial court conducted a parole revocation hearing and found the allegations proven by a preponderance of the evidence.1 The court revoked parole and sentenced Rood to 180 days in jail with 72 days of custody credit. Rood timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

Appointed counsel filed a brief raising no issues and seeking our independent review of the record under People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. The brief includes counsel’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.