Martello

Martello v. Merliss CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2026B328695California5,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/20/26 Martello v. Merliss CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

ALICE MARTELLO, B328695

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. v. No. 22STCV02776)

JOSHUA MERLISS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephanie M. Bowick, Judge. Affirmed. Crawford Law Group and Daniel Crawford for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

—————————— Defendants and respondents Joshua Merliss and Wilkie Cheong (collectively, defendants) filed separate motions under California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, commonly known as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.