Edgcomb

Edgcomb v. Powers CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2026A171951California4,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

John and April married in October 1993. They had one daughter, who reached majority in April 2018. John and April enjoyed a high marital standard of living. John was the primary earner, working as the partner of a law firm and generally earning seven figures in annual income. April was the primary caretaker for their daughter, and she worked part-time as a physical education instructor. In 2014, the last year she worked, April earned less than $30,000. John and April separated in May 2015 and subsequently negotiated a marital settlement agreement. Judgment was entered incorporating the agreement on March 15, 2018. Each party received $3.2 million in community property; April’s share included the family residence. The judgment recognized John’s “base income” as $579,000, and it imputed $70,000 in income to April. The judgment required John to pay $15,000 per month in spousal support to April, plus bonus support in the event John’s annual income exceeded $579,000 up to a cap of $900,000.

3 The spousal support payments were taxable to April and deductible to

John. The percentage of John’s income payable as bonus support gradually decreased, starting at 25 percent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.