Allums
Allums v. City of Oakland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DENNIS ALLUMS, No. 24-6837 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-06272-TLT Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF OAKLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Dennis Allums appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112
(9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Pickern v. Pier
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Imports…