Allums

Allums v. City of Oakland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202624-6837California419 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENNIS ALLUMS, No. 24-6837 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-06272-TLT Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Dennis Allums appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112

(9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Pickern v. Pier

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Imports…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.