W.F.
Wiskendy Francois v. Warden of Otay Mesa Detention Center
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WISKENDY FRANCOIS, Case No.: 3:25-cv-03635-BTM-MMP
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PETITION FOR
HABEAS CORPUS
WARDEN OF OTAY MESA [ECF NO. 1]
DETENTION CENTER,
16 Respondent. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Wiskendy Francois’s1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons stated below, the petition is DISMISSED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 22 23 24 25 1 The Ninth Circuit has held that “the identity of the parties in any action, civil or criminal, should not be concealed except in an unusual case, where there is a need for the cloak of anonymity.” United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 1012 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. Doe, 488 F.3d 1154, 1156 n.1 (9th Cir. 2007)). The Petitioner did not move the Court to conceal his identity or otherwise argue that he needed anonymity in this case. Cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (Protective Orders). Thus, the…