Casey

Miguel Antonio-Gonzalez v. Jeremy Casey, in his official as Warden of Imperial Reginal Detention Facility, et. al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20263:26-cv-00286California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ANTONIO-GONZALEZ, Case No.: 26-cv-0286-BJC-MMP Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

v.

CORPUS AND PROHIBITING

JEREMY CASEY, in his official as TRANSFER OF PETITIONER Warden of Imperial Reginal Detention 15 Facility, et. al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 On January 16, 2026, Petitioner Miguel Antonio-Gonzalez filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. After a review of the petition, this Court deems it appropriate to require Respondents to file a response. Additionally, the Court finds a limited stay is necessary to preserve the status quo to allow the Court to provide a reasoned decision on the pending application. See E-C-R- v. Noem, No. 3:25- CV-1230-SI, 2025 WL 2300543, at *1 (D. Or. July 16, 2025) (finding an order under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, necessary to prevent the arrest, detention or deportation of the plaintiff while the parties litigate the merits of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.