Anthony
Marian Anthony, Jasmine Johanesen v. County of San Diego, et al.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20263:25-cv-00310California1,254 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 25-cv-00310-DMS-MMP
MARIAN ANTHONY, JASMINE
JOHANESEN,
ORDER:
Plaintiffs, v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION;
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 14 Defendants. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND;
16 (3) DECLINING TO RULE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR EARLY
DISCOVERY; and
19 (4) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR RESCUAL
21 [ECF No. 36]
23 Pending now is Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order granting Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part the County’s motion to strike (“MTD Order”). (Mot., ECF No. 36-1.) Plaintiffs also request leave to amend their Complaint, an Order for early discovery, and the recusal of the undersigned. The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to…