Anthony

Marian Anthony, Jasmine Johanesen v. County of San Diego, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20263:25-cv-00310California1,254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 25-cv-00310-DMS-MMP

MARIAN ANTHONY, JASMINE

JOHANESEN,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION;

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 14 Defendants. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND;

16 (3) DECLINING TO RULE ON

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR EARLY

DISCOVERY; and

19 (4) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR RESCUAL

21 [ECF No. 36]

23 Pending now is Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order granting Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part the County’s motion to strike (“MTD Order”). (Mot., ECF No. 36-1.) Plaintiffs also request leave to amend their Complaint, an Order for early discovery, and the recusal of the undersigned. The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.