Massengale

Massengale v. Green

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202624-7070California454 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN MASSENGALE, No. 24-7070 D.C. No. 1:24-cv-00065-KES-CDB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KENNETH R. GREEN, Jr., Magistrate Trustee; JUDY J. ROGERS, District Attorney; ARTURO REVELO, Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kirk Edward Sherriff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Massengale appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). connection with his arrest and detention for failure to appear in court. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.